Board Thread:Season 32 - New Zealand/@comment-27760005-20160420222742/@comment-27051031-20160421215051

Hey Matt,

Before I answer your question I want to address what you have said about me.

First, I appreciate the long speech because it shows how much you truly care about the game and I am glad that you took the time to write it all out.

Second, I understand why you're mad and why you think I am in denial about my game. But what makes me mad is the fact that you are so upset that I lied to you about voting to keep you when all you've been doing is lying to me all game. Also the fact that while you were still in the game and were telling me that I was a great utr player and that I wasn't a goat like everyone was saying but then here say the complete opposite just proves how much of a liar you are. So even though I do agree and understand most of what you have said, it is extremely hypocritical. Also you being a bitter juror makes me laugh because you were so paranoid about how everyone else would be bitter and wouldn't vote for you in the ftc. So the fact that you are rallying against me because I lied to you is kind of despicable.

Now onto your question.

The three best players in this game in my opinion are:

1) Kostas - He played one of the best games imaginable. He was extremely social, strategic, and was always great at competitions. He was in control of many things that went on during the game. His only flaw was being too much of a threat.

2) Casper - If he wouldn't have left because of an idol he would probably be in the ftc right now. I believe he was even better of a player than Kostas was, but he gets 2nd because he didn't last as long

3) Pav - Pav was one of the smartest people to ever play this season. He was strategic, as social as one could be with all the swaps we had, and great at comps. His only flaw was trusting you. He is ranked third because he unfortunately didn't make the jury stage which saddens me because he deserved to be here more than anyone.

The three worst jury members are:

1) Charlie - You kind of fell short of what I think you wanted to achieve in this game. You say that no one ever spoke to you when you were on the bottom. But that goes both ways. You could have reached out to people and tried to change your situation. I admire your dedication to the game, but I just don't feel that you have much to show for the amount of time you played.

2) Ciere - I don't think many would agree with this choice but we were rivals in this game. You didn't trust me, and I didn't trust you. I admire the fact that you did try to rally to save yourself, and also that you were able to use an idol to keep yourself in the game. But you were useless to my strategy and to my game which is why I am choosing you.

3) Josh - I'm really sorry, I think you could be a fantastic player in any other game. But the cards you were dealt landed you in a shitty position. You weren't as social as you could have been, you weren't as strategic, you weren't as competitive, and you knew that you were a goat to others.

Finally I would like to address your last paragraph. Every single person that was a part of this game has played it how they have wanted to play it. Just because the three of us didn't start drama, or make some big crazy move does not mean we didn't play the game. I understand you are saying that this isn't a personal attack. But it feels completely personal and I almost didn't want to answer your question because of it. It also makes me think less of you as a person outside of this game. The fact that you seem to think you're a king because of the moves you made is disgusting to me. You're sitting on the jury because of the way you played the game and we're here because of the way we played ours. Whose to judge what players were better or worse? The goal is to outwit, outlast, and outplay. I think the fact that us three are still standing means that we accomplished that. So take your mean, rude, and obnoxious speech and shove it. Time for you to take your seat where you belong.