Board Thread:Season Bidding/@comment-4062486-20131214014333/@comment-26468853-20131222113732

Malakal101 wrote: By favorites I ment returning players winning.And there not a whole lot wrong with a fan winning it's just it would feel unatural,Plus I don't really like Streaks to be broken.Although the American curse I'm glad that ended because I am American.I have nothing personal against the fans it's just If I support a streak the. I'm gonna stick to it.Its just my opinion of wanting that streak to keep on going. I really don't think that that's a.... I don't even know how to say it, that's horribly discriminating thing to say, Fans don't deserve tow in because Favourites have been winning? Favourites only one because they played a good game, Look at the highest placing members from each season with 50/50 split between returning players and new players.

Natalie and Erik were the highest placing memebers in Micronesia, Parvati, Amanda and Cirie were a powerful trio that had an all-female alliance that promised each other Final Three, and had it not been for Amanda's hidden immunity idol, Alexis and Natalie would've probably finished higher because they would be up against Cirie and Parvati.

In Caramoan, Sherri played a horribly coat-tailing game and lost because nobody thought she deserved to win, had Eddie gone into the Final Three as opposed to Dawn, then Eddie would've gotten votes from Reynold, maybe Andrea and Malcolm. That's already 3 votes.

In Blood vs Water, Ciera and Hayden would've gotten enough to votes to win, Ciera was a VERY dangerous and powerful player but the as we've seen the trio of Monica, Tyson and Gervase were in the control and dictated council after council. So while the luck and results have been the same. a Fan can win. So It's not fair to say that a Fan shouldn't win because it has a 50/50 split between returning players and new players.