Board Thread:Season 41 - Bali/@comment-24263828-20170703214820

Congrats on making the final 3 bla bla bla cliché cliché. My vote is undecided.

Troyzan-I mean Danielle, my question for you is who are you? Brawn? Beauty? Host? Are you in this game? Jk, I know you did things, and despite Jeff Probst harping on BIG MOVEZ!!!!1!!1, playing UTR can be a valid strategy. My actual question for you is this: I’ve heard that you said you wanted out of the game, which you may or may not have been faking. If it’s true, then why do you deserve to win over someone who really wants to win? If you were faking, then why? Ps your responses have rocked so far, just please keep the video under 5 minutes.

Nadine, girl, you rock, but your FTC speech looks like the half assed essay I wrote on my AP test. Also, anyone who’s seen Pearl Islands or Total Drama World Tour knows that throwing challenges isn’t a good idea. You said in your speech that you didn’t want a brains majority…and then at the merge you were worried because the brains alliance was the minority. And you would’ve succeeded at the first merge vote if only one more person had voted with us instead of against us. There would’ve been one more brain in our alliance had you not thrown the challenge! I think your social game is on fleek, but some jurors don’t. People have said that you’re unresponsive (which I don’t think is a fair accusation when you’re just on a different time zone) and that you didn’t bother talking to or bonding with people outside your alliance (which I also think is kinda unfair, since Danielle and Max don’t bother to do it either but no one’s criticizing them for it). My question is…explain your social game. Why should the other jurors vote for you? And maybe explain your speech while you’re at it.

Tyler-I mean Max, you got VL info. Even if you didn’t ask for it, you still read it, and according to Ally, you tried to fix problems and improve your game because of the information you got. Even if it was against your will, that information gave you an advantage. Your speech is 99% apologizing for playing a flawed game, is as long as the entire Encyclopedia Britannica, and desperately needs paragraph breaks. Your social game reminds me of JT’s strategic game and Chet Welch’s physical game. If you didn’t start the campaign against me like you claimed, then who did? What exactly happened? 