Board Thread:Season Offers/@comment-26863380-20160124155614/@comment-26863380-20160222231426

Dreampenguin wrote: I'm concerned about the Final Two facing a Jury of Eight. How do you plan to resolve ties? Does 3rd place have tie-breaking power?

Having to sit out of a challenge to get an idol is interesting, and you should consider whether or not players will get to know challenge rules prior to making a choice of whether or not to sit out. If you are trying to emulate the TV show, I should point out that if you announce (or players can otherwise see) who is sitting out then they will have a better idea of who has an idol, whereas on the TV show players didn't get such an indication -- in fact, it was only players playing in the challenge who would even have a chance. But the mechanics of your rules are nonetheless interesting.

Tiernan420 looks like he knows what he's talking about. I'm not yet familiar with this community, but if bids have stopped then I guess you are out of luck posting your bid. Still, I appreciated reading it.

I do agree that S33 is too early for returning players given that S31 currently has returning players. To make matters worse, the way you worded it makes it sound like all of these players you'd include would already have been in MORE than 1 past game. But that's probably just an issue with your wording and not something you intended. If it works the person would secretly sit out while the tribe believes that they are getting a challenge strike.