Board Thread:Season Offers/@comment-24046040-20141122030301/@comment-24728615-20141122040800

I want to preface this by saying I really like this bid, however I could stand see this Leadership twist tweaked a little bit.

It was also pretty unclear about the person being sent to exile... are they just an observer that can talk? Do they have a vote? I don't get how this changes anything if so because no one talks strategy in the main chat and everyone can see the other tribe's tribal already. There is no rule about cross tribal talking, just a taboo, so I see no point in making this just about alliance forming.

I may have missed a point in the twist, elaborate in the revised version if I am wrong.

I suggest giving the leader a decision to make that would actually have impact on the game rather than something that would ultimately be futile. I think as is it is rather underwhelming.

I liked the leadership twist in Gabon, and a leadership twist here would be a nice breath of fresh air from exile island or redemption island one million times in a row. (or either of those just with a different name..... cough cough... enough already, get some goddamn imagination.) Glad to see something different.

The suggestion that it gives 'an unfair' target is a pointless criticism because Survivor is a social game and targets will be assigned no matter what is in the game. If someone can't handle the target on their back they can ask not to be Elder in the decision process. The idea of a reluctant Elder is not likely because the rest of the tribe wouldn't want to give power to someone like that.

The only other bid I like aside from this one is Cape Verde, but this has a lot of potential.

PROS:

-three tribes

-very interesting premise for tribe devision

-a leadership twist instead of 'a rehashed exile/redemption twist

CONS:

-unclear about the impact and relevancy of the leadership twist. Possibly try and think of another way for the leader to impact the game, or explain it better I guess.