Board Thread:Season 49 - Newfoundland/@comment-34114403-20181019062316/@comment-32469668-20181019151418

'''Hi Edvin, I found your question a bit confusing at first but I’ll answer it in the way I think makes sense. I’ll explain my thinking for the boot list from megre and hopefully that’ll show why I was left with the people I was left with at at F6. The first vote I voted Jordan because I wanted to go along with what the Shana tribe wanted and it made sense because I didn’t talk to Jordan. The Ain quit was something I couldn’t control ofc but that left me down an ally sadly. The Tom/Elsa revote was where I again followed what my alliance wanted but also formulated the plan to flip next round, so to stay unnoticed I just followed what was expected of me so as not to raise any attention and be able to carry out my plan next round. Then next round I voted you as Matt had used his exile pass, my personal reasoning for this was that it would allow me to stay loyal to Vilma/Matt and would also seem like enough of a flip to Tom/Conor to keep me on good terms with them. Then this leaves us at F6, you say I had left myself with a lot of difficult people to beat, but I already had a plan of how to vote out Matt/Vilma who were the biggest threats left and that would leave me with Rob/Conor/Tom who I felt were not that big threats as I knew I had been control of the game and who was being voted out up until F5, so I did not feel they were as big jury threats. '''

'''For the second question of my plan if I lose immunity, If I had lost, I would try to find an angle which would allow me to make FTC, but I knew that wouldn’t be an easy task and would be almost impossible since everyone recognised me as the biggest threat, but I wouldn’t have given up, which is why I put a lottt of effort into that FIC to make sure I did make it here to FTC. I understand how you can pick apart my game and say ‘well you had to rely on immunity to make it to FTC’, but there’s a reason why people saw me as the biggest threat and one to take out, because I had been strategically dominant throughout the merge, there’s a reason people wanted to vote me out over getting Conor out or Rob out, because they felt I had played the game better than them and would get more votes than them, otherwise there would be no reason to vote me out. Them targeting me and saying ‘I would have voted out Alex but he won immunity’ proves this and that they felt I had played a better game than me otherwise they wouldn’t be bothered if I was FTC or not. Also, in my opinion, I don’t believe a hypothetical of ‘well if this happened you wouldn’t be here’ negates the fact that they did make it, I did win the immunity and I did make it to FTC, I won my place here, which I don’t think is a negative thing, the fact that I put effort in and came out with a win is a positive to me. If the only negative you can find in my game is a hypothetical of ‘this could have happened’ then I think my game is a deserving one to win. '''

'''Thanks for the questions Edvin. '''