Board Thread:Season 46 - Kariba/@comment-29651946-20180414121944/@comment-33060993-20180416011509

Hey again. I'll just address your points quickly, but I think after a day of disputing, we've really come to a similar consensus on the Matthias vote, or at least where we agree and disagree, so I just want to clarify with regards to the points made, and move on so we don't have to go back and forth over concrete perceptions:

1) "true and idt she will. she'll flip back to hals next round because her game is basically flipping back and forth" - I included this first because it was a part of the conversation wherein I reaffirmed why you would stick with us. Interpret it how you want, but that's the context of the situation - showing how I hid my duplicity and solidified my position with Jack; despite the fact that I'd thrown his name, he indicated that he trusted me more. If you want to see an example as to why I believe your game is flawed, look to my response to Dovile.

2) After arguing all day, the consensus I've arrived to about the Matthias vote is that we both wanted the same outcome. The "easiest route" fixation you have is not something from my confessional, but rather the angle I was going with for Vincent. For my game, Matthias was a risk factor who blew up more plans than he helped to make and ultimately, with us working against each other at F11, F9, F8, and F7, it made no sense for my game to keep him compared to Jack, who I simply trusted more. That's my rationale behind wanting Matthias out.

3) Initially, I wanted Jack - but that was before Matthias threw my name to him and Vincent, as well as leaked information. I was sincerely trying to work with Matthias here, but it proved to be too much of a risk. It's less a matter of your influence, and more Matthias' own strategic moves changing the direction of the vote and how I maneuvered from there to get Vincent off of my original plan and onto the revised one, as well as planting the lies necessary to get Jack on board. You consistently refer to a "lack of understanding" of the game, but we both know that's unfounded at this point. I provided detailed analyses on the jurors, of their flaws, of my game and flaws, of your game and flaw, of Vincent's game and flaw, If I have written over fifteen thousand words of responses over the past two days on the game I've played and still don't understand it, then yikes. It's just unrealistic. I've gone through my network at that point - I was well-connected and in four different alliances/arrangements of some capacity.

I hope that clarifies my stance on all of this, and thank you if you've decided to read through this because I'm just clarifying that Roisin's attempt to peg me as lacking awareness is really unfounded at this point in the process. Hopefully, the series of antagonizing responses to just about anything I post will come to an abrupt end, because I think everything had really been said, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a response soon xoxo. Cya all faves & thank you Dan for your patience since I've taken a lot of time to rebut the post above, but have intended to since I woke up this morning!!