Talk:Survivor: Nepal/@comment-4190137-20130723135745/@comment-5021832-20130725113231

I think it's a matter of definition. I think everybody who ever plays Survivor "deserves" to place where they placed because that's how it panned out. But the merits of their overall gameplay do not necessarily correspond. For instance, Russell deserved to make it to the FTC because he managed to get there, but he played a terrible social game. Laura Alexander, for instance, was playing a pretty good social and strategic game, but was still voted out early. I know this isn't the conventional way of looking at the game, but it's the way I see it.