Board Thread:Season 6 - Nepal/@comment-3451422-20130723161356/@comment-5118755-20130723164945

Well, I took about 20 minutes writing this speech, and then my comp spazzed so I guess i am starting again.

Well, I will start with the winner this time. To be honest, I am stuck between 2 choices. Richard Hatch and Todd Herzog. Both played strategic games, and did not care who they trampled. They both had complete pain in the asses on their tribes, that could have gone a long time before, but they kept because it was their strategy. They played the best games in my eyes, as it did not stop at the game. They had hard tribal councils, with even competitors but managed to use their game as a strategy to win.

I do feel that being compared to Russell Hantz is an alright comparison, as I feel he played the game knowing he was the villain. But he did not care about it, and used it to get him far. I feel I was dubbed as a villain from an early stage, originally I was planning on trying to shift this, but I guess I decided playing as a villain was not bad if it got you far. Rather than being that noble person who is first off. But I guess, I am just idiotic. Because according to most of the jury, I am not a villain. I am just a poser, and an asshole.

And as for Survivor ORG winner...I really dont know their strategies at all. I know Lucy was viewed as a sheep, so she is more similar to Dallas. Hickman fought back, and played an alliance game...but I really dont know Alfons, Gerda or Mihai's strategy. So I cant make a fair judgement. As since I have no connection to Lucy other than being British, I would only have Hickman to say...I will look around at Mihai, Gerda and Alfons and see if I can find out what they did to win. And maybe I can come back with a more insightful answer.