Board Thread:Season 8 - Korea/@comment-4062486-20131011040630/@comment-2142533-20131012034128

Ḡwẵine Ḹٍٍkƨ Ĺiĸe Ͼềлȑềd wrote: The hosts shouldn't have introduced a 3rd idol in the first place then.

The deadline for idol playing should always be however many idols there are + 1 for immunity necklace + 2 for the remaining players.

If you think there are such things as default eliminations. Explain why there are sometimes a tie-breaker instead of a purple rock elimination. Because there is no such thing as a default elimination.

Say if James and Carl vote Emma and Emma and Mark vote Carl, and James has immunity, the reason there is a tie-breaker instead of a purple rock elimination is that Emma would be the only person up for elimination.

As Mario said, there is no exact rule - it depends on the producers. I respect in what you are saying, but they are warned already that idols are playable until Final 5 (the same as the real life Survivor: Philippines with 3 idols), which means there is a possibility for this unlikely scenario to happen. OK, I guess I could say we overdid it with the Merge idol (in the hands of the minority alliance, they could overturn a 3-3-3 or 2-2-2 vote and turn it in their favor, but didn't seem to happen), but it is not my fault that Amir kept 2 idols and Aaron kept 1 idol until Final 5, I mean Amir could've not given Aston his idol and voted him out.