Board Thread:Season 23 - Greece/@comment-24206786-20150117031439/@comment-25567389-20150119041124

i disagree. i think the point of final tribal council is to discuss our strategies and defend ourselves, and i fully expect you to do the same - i have no problem with you providing rebuttals to my arguments against you. these are not intended as "snide comments" but to clarify and defend my game. i am saying these things with as much respect as i can and because i am not going to let comments about my game that are untrue just sit unanswered. i want the jury to know what happened and i want them to understand how i played, so i'm not going to not defend myself if you're saying things about me that aren't correct. and like i said i totally expect you to do the same thing! if the jury doesn't like me rebutting your points they are totally welcome to say so and i will absolutely respect it, but until that happens i'm not going to just sit here and not try to win. thanks.

1. i totally respect that as your strategy and i'm not arguing against the fact that it got you here but you were saying that you were able to "be included in a premade alliance" which was completely not true, so that's what i was responding to.

2. i believe my point of "your alliances fell apart or were dismantled" still stands.

3. again, if your strategy was to be a goat and not be seen as a threat, that's fine and i understand and respect that. that's valid and it did get you to the end. but it sounded like you were also saying you had some different deeper strategy and that's the part that i don't understand. if i'm totally misinterpreting what you said, i sincerely apologize.