Board Thread:Season Bidding/@comment-4062486-20131214014333/@comment-4190137-20131221231932

VogtOut wrote: Ḡwẵine Ḹٍٍkƨ Ĺiĸe Ͼềлȑềd wrote: This is just my opinion/suggestions of what I would expect to see in this season should the bid inevitably win (please don't see this as some kind of demand, or something like that).


 * 1) No three-timers: there weren't any in any of the real show's installments, therefore I don't think there should be any here.
 * 2) 50/50 gender cast: with this being FvF, scouring 5 newbie females and bringing back 5 female favorites shouldn't be any sort of problem. It should without doubt happen. They do it in the real show after all.
 * 3) The community should get a say in who is on the Favorites tribe (particularly the males, assuming the 2nd point isn't overlooked with there being 5 female Favorites). There should be an open discussion (not a poll, as the result can easily be manipulated, w/ people simply asking randoms to aimlessly vote for them), nominating 8-10 males, and then being made to let the hosts choose from them.

This is just my opinion of how to make this season with potential even more of a success as it already seems set to be :D 1. I do agree with this one, there are plenty of people who have only played once.

2. Honestly, I don't care about this one. At the end of the day, it's about the cast. If we don't have a good cast, then we don't have a good season. So if we think that having equal men and women is a good cast for this season, then we'll do it, but we will not be scheduling our whole season around it.

3. No. I get why people want a public opinion, but the moderators still should be able to choose their players. We have talked about opening auditions for Favorites. Then how is someone considered a 'favorite' if there's no referral that they are one? It's not Survivor: Fans vs Mod's Favorites, is it?