Board Thread:Season 36 - Tikal/@comment-29404679-20161016035746/@comment-26896797-20161016225540

Hey Michael! :) Thanks for the compliments and praising my game, it means a lot.



 '''If the decision to vote for a winner was a math equation, what weight percentage would you give to each of those elements or are they all even? '''

I don't think they're even.

I think the physical aspect is 10% of the decision to vote for a winner. The challenges are important but there has been winners that have never won any individual challenges. You can survive without immunity so it's not as important as the other two.

I think the strategic aspect is 40% of the decision to vote for a winner. It's important to have a good strategy to win but at the same time, every finalist had a valid strategy to get where they are now. There's also a lot of different strategies, and there's no strategy that can make you win the game easily.

I think the social aspect is 50% of the decision to vote for a winner. You can't make moves if you don't have the numbers, and to get these numbers you have to build relationships with them. In real Survivor seasons, there has been a lot of social players that have won and they didn't need to make big moves to win. While the strategic players, they needed to have a good social game to win (except Tony).