Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-2049739-20140404040757

''Before we delve into this, I'd like to state that in no way, shape or form is this meant to add twigs to a fire that is turning into a bonfire. This post is meant to state my opinion, not ignite more personal vendettas. However, if you are offended by this, just state it NICELY in the comments, and I will take it down. Thanks, and on to it... ''

Hi, guys. It's me. Survivor: Madagascar is a decent season in it's own right. I must give credit where credit is due. However, it has also received massive controversial criticism, and it's pretty much never-ending. Because I suck with words, I'll just state it now: I don't think we need an FvF 2.

My reasoning? Here you go:

- Due to the fact that there is only ten slots, the cast process was met with huge fury by many disappointed people, and it might happen again.

- Both the fans and the favourites are affected by their titles. Favourites tend to take their title a little too seriously (although not directly in an FvF, Cesternino is a clear example of this), and the fans are often flipping to the faves.

- Speaking of flipping, it's usually a very predictable storyline. A big amount of fans go pre-merge, and the fans then flip to the faves. (I'll wait when the season is over to give examples.)

- If we are eager to make another FvF and then dismiss the repeat of other formats due to 'wanting to try something new', we're all making a giant double-standard.

That is my reasoning.

If you agree with me, write .

If you disagree, write .

And once again, this isn't an another attempt to start an argument. 